By Gerry Crispin, SPHR and Mark Mehler
mmc@careerxroads.com
If there is one thing we've learned over the last decade writing our Source of Hire whitepapers, it's that the sources to which employers attribute their hires are no longer independent elements in an increasingly elongated supply chain of prospects and candidates. How these different elements interact needs to be better understood and tracked if more sophisticated employment strategies and tactics are to be efficiently deployed.
In our most recent study of 185,000 hires, SOH 2013: Perception is Reality, we concluded:
Ed Newman (@newmaed), currently at iMomentus, recently published a revised version of how the Fortune 500 is evolving when it comes to adopting mobile recruiting. Focusing on the careers side, he rated factors such as "the existence of a formal mobile-optimized corporate website, a mobile-optimized career section and mobile apply process. Companies were ranked in one of five categories: Front Runner, Early Stage, Treading Water, Toe in the Water and Off the Radar."
According to Ed, progress has been made in the last six months but "very few companies are taking a comprehensive and strategic approach to ensure a consistent brand experience on the mobile web." Key findings in the report include:
Earlier this year, two CareerXroads' interns used mobile devices to visit each company on the Fortune 500 list. They found similar results noting:
Read our full report: The Evolving World of Mobile Recruiting
An Executive Order [CR22] of the President of the United States was issued today requiring the end of the candidate Black Hole and Demanding Full Transparency about the Recruiting Process. President Obama, after three years deliberation has ended the so-called black hole for candidates with a sweeping executive order that includes the following:
Somewhat controversial in the early versions of the executive order (and not included in the final document) was a $5 fine for job seekers who waste company time applying for jobs they obviously are unqualified to consider. It was thought this rule would apply to most of the candidates running for office and so was quickly dropped.
Millions of celebrating job seekers filled the streets when the EO was published on April 1.
Thousands of Corporate flacks immediately protested that the onerous and costly restrictions would reduce America's ability to compete globally. Several firms went so far as to cite examples of abusive behavior regarding candidates - specifically ignoring their requests for status as "Customary and Expected." These firms offered Glassdoor and TalentFunction's Candidate Experience Awards as proof that the US is far from ready to handle a positive Candidate Experience. A lobby of companies was formed to protect recruiting rights of employers and demanded that at least 10 years - not 6 months - was necessary to comply with the Executive Order. Idaho and Texas floated secession petitions through their employer councils but were having trouble getting actual employees to sign them.
The NRA issued this statement: "We are pleased to note that the executive order does NOT appear to infringe on the right of every job seeker to carry his/her personal weapon-of-choice into any interview." "However," they continued, "we will continue to monitor for any attack of the 2nd amendment rights of our citizens."
April fool! (sort of)
On May 11, 2010 it is worth noting that Barak Obama did indeed, sign an executive order for the Federal Government. John Zappe wrote about it in this ERE article suggesting the EO was an effort to end the 'Black Hole.
Surprisingly, in the three years the Executive Order has been in effect, some progress has been made. We are actually surprised at the extent and thrilled to see the demise of the dreaded (and useless) essay on government applications. The website that is attempting to keep the public apprised about the Federal Government's Hiring Reforms notes honestly (and openly) that the lack of competent HR people and continuing resistance from hiring managers are still serious challenges.
However some metrics appear to be in place (even if they are sometimes ignored) and the Federal Government now routinely reports:
The long form version (whitepaper) of the Candidate Experience Awards and the data collected by the TalentBoard is available at www.thecandes.org. A summary slide-deck of the CandEs was recently posted on Slideshare.net.
The non-profit TalentBoard that runs the Candidate Experience initiative announced the start of the 2013 Candidate Experience Awards on April 16 (companies will have all of May and most of June to register and complete the initial survey).
Thirty-seven North American firms were honored last year (10 in the UK this year). It is hoped that 50 or more firms will be able to demonstrate they meet or exceed basic requirements for the treatment of candidates. It is also expected that analysis by several firms will begin to demonstrate the links between candidate practices and company and recruiting performance measures.
Joe Murphy, Shaker Consulting Group, has archived and posted an excellent interview with James Gilmore, author of The Experience Economy, an award-winning business tome that explores the nature of experience as a driver and differentiator in business. The book has interesting connections to recruiting and the Candidate Experience and in this column they explore the experience stages and more, that Gilmore built in his book: Attracting, Entering, During, Exiting and Extending.
Student debt stands at 1 trillion dollars. What % of today's younger households are paying off student debt (and is this an interesting retention bonus opportunity)?
a) 10% b) 25% c) 40% d) 60%
[Answers at the end]
According to this HRExaminer article by Heather Bussing, employers who supply mobile tablets and/or smartphones to their recruiters - and perhaps even those who subsidize them - can "ask for your [social media] passwords and look at any data on the device."
We're guessing that if we were working in recruiting, we would not be accepting this perk.
The Worst Job Interview Ever: Brought to you by Heineken sets up an interview you would remember for a life time - and you'd probably need a beer every time you recalled the experience. We would love to visit the winner of this 'test', who was hired by Heineken, a year from now to see if there was any regret on either side.
What % of new hires, according to DDI's 2012 forecast, experience "Buyer's [Candidate's] Remorse" within 6 months of accepting a new job - essentially regretting the decision?
a) 15% b) 30% c) 50% d) 65%
[Answers at the end]
This YouTube Ernst & Young video, Maria's story: the exceptional Ernst & Young experience, is admittedly, a bit long but we're guessing the response from MBAs looking for more than a job and wondering what a career in a firm like E&Y might look like is so exceptional that the time passes quickly.
Yes, Cost per Hire, by itself, is a small part of the overall measure of a recruiting function. It would highlight efficiency without knowing if what you're doing is worth being efficient about. Still, Aspen Advisors, working with the SHRM/ANSI (American National Standards Institute) has taken last year's standard definition of CPH and built a free online CPH template to calculate your Cost per Hire.
This New York Times article, Business Recovery has Brought More Jobs for Men than Women, offers the fact that fewer women are in jobs in ages 20-25 and 45-49 than would be expected but the explanations are weak. The author seems to imply there are women's jobs that haven't come back.
This new IDC whitepaper: Future of Mail is Social, developed with funding from IBM, describes in detail what the future of business communication will look like. The paper's core thesis is that social email is "both a powerful accelerator for social adoption and the backdrop for relief from email fatigue." Email is evolving from:
Recruiting functions in some ways lead the transitions noted above. (But that last item, if accurate suggests an interesting challenge for LinkedIn's future.)
What % of US Students has a Smartphone today?
a) 35% b) 59% c) 73% d) 91%
[Answers at the end]
If you are Smith and Wollensky and you need to attract high-quality financial interns for your business but are directly competing with the more obvious NY financial houses, what can you do?
John Sumser's description in HRExaminer of what S&W actually did, Dear XXX if they won't hire you, we will, was both entertaining and eye-opening in how they publicly contrasted their respective employment brands. At the bottom of this piece is a slide-deck John uses in presentations on employment branding that includes several useful strategy insights.
Smartphone owners are supposedly spending 127 minutes a day connecting to - what? Business Insider summarized several mobile trends from its longer-form BI Intelligence report (that requires a $500 subscription for 'in-depth' info). BI suggests the most important trends include:
All of these studies suggest that the opportunity to develop new recruiting channels continues to expand. It is too bad that our method of tracking the influence of these channels (at various points in the recruiting supply chain) is so poorly developed.